©2026 ZenABM - All Rights Reserved.
Influ2 is marketed as the first person-based account-based marketing platform.
It promises to target ads at specific individuals within your target accounts.
That’s a bold twist on the usual account-level tactics.
In theory, it sounds like ABM is finally getting personal.
In practice, is Influ2 delivering substance or just repackaging what savvy marketers already do (uploading contact lists to LinkedIn, anyone)?
This deep dive takes a deeper look at Influ2’s features, pricing, user feedback, and where it stands in the crowded ABM landscape.
We’ll also see how ZenABM (a first-party LinkedIn-focused ABM platform) might be a better alternative or even serve as a complementary layer to Influ2 or whichever ABM suite you have.
In case you want it short:
Influ2 is about person-based advertising and ABM.
Let’s look at its core offerings:
Unlike many ABM platforms that stick to company-level audiences, Influ2 shows ads to specific individuals on major ad networks.
For example, you could target Jane Doe, CIO of Acme Corp, and have her see your ad on LinkedIn and later on a news site via Google Display.
No more wasting impressions on interns and random folks at the account who aren’t influencers in the deal.
How reliable is that matching?
Well, that is low 🙁
A study by Syft found that IP-matching accuracy for website visitor identification is a mere 42%.
The platform doesn’t just blast ads; it tells you exactly who saw or clicked them.
Influ2 will report impressions, clicks, and even website visits by individual name for each target on your list.
Your sales team can get real-time intel like “John Doe (Senior Director at Dream Account) saw 45 impressions and clicked 3 of them.”
Armed with these contact-level intent signals, sales knows who’s engaging and can tailor outreach accordingly.
Influ2 also tracks for third-party intent signals like keyword searches and the sites visited by your target contacts.
Pro Tip: Influ2 can surface third-party intent, like what keywords people may be searching or which sites they might be browsing, but that data is borrowed and often fuzzy. B2B buying decisions come from whole accounts, not a single contact’s browsing history, so these signals rarely map cleanly to real purchase momentum. ZenABM takes a cleaner route by giving you first-party company-level intent straight from your own LinkedIn ads. You see exactly which companies engaged with which feature-focused creative, which campaigns woke them up, and how their interest is shifting in real time.
Influ2 enables automated ad sequencing based on engagement triggers.
If Jane Doe clicked Ad A, you can automatically move her to see Ad B next, mirroring a personalized buyer’s journey.
The platform lets you set up rules so each contact’s ad experience evolves as they progress (or don’t) through the funnel.
It’s like marketing automation workflows, but for ads aiming to keep each person engaged with content relevant to their stage.
In theory this delivers the right message to the right person at the right time.
In practice, it’s only as good as the logic you set and your content variety.
Some users have noted the platform’s dynamic personalization could be stronger and more flexible, so it may not quite be the choose-your-own-adventure experience the marketing materials imply.
As a modern ABM tool, Influ2 plays nicely with the rest of your tech stack.
It offers integrations with major CRMs and marketing platforms like Salesforce, HubSpot, Marketo, Microsoft Dynamics, and marketing automation systems like Eloqua.
It also connects to sales engagement tools such as Outreach and Salesloft, and even collaboration hubs like Slack and Microsoft Teams.
The idea is to funnel those precious contact-level insights directly to where your sales and marketing teams live – e.g. pinging a Slack channel when a target account contact engages, or updating CRM lead records with ad engagement data.
Users generally praise these integration capabilities, though a few have struggled aligning Influ2 with certain existing workflows.
Implementation typically takes around one month on average, which is relatively speedy for an ABM platform (some competitors require a small army of consultants and several months to get rolling).
Influ2 platform provides dashboards to tie ad engagements to pipeline and revenue outcomes.
For example, you can see metrics like “982 buying groups influenced, 234 opportunities generated, 158 progressed, 17 won” – all attributed to people who saw or clicked ads. It offers revenue influence reports to show how ad campaigns contributed to deals.
Given the person-specific nature, data privacy is a big consideration.
Influ2 markets a “unique privacy-first technology” where their algorithm matches contacts in a GDPR/CCPA-compliant way.
They are SOC 2 Type II certified for data protection.
Essentially, they use hashed emails and first-party data rather than shady third-party cookies to target individuals.
This is meant to reassure your legal team that uploading a list of contacts is done securely and that ad targeting doesn’t violate ad network policies.
Plus, the tool has built-in ad creative storage too:
Influ 2 provides a list of hot accounts and the specific contacts within them that the sales team must attend to.
If you’re hoping to find clear pricing on Influ2’s website, sorry, you won’t.
Influ2 follows the enterprise software tradition of “Contact us for pricing”, with custom quotes based on your situation.
But here’s what’s available on third-party sources:
Let that sink in: $5 per contact who interacts (clicks or even just sees an ad). If you have 1,000 contacts on your target list, you could be looking at ~$5,000 for them to be reached and that’s on top of whatever internal cost to produce ads and manage the program. That user also noted their results were underwhelming for the price: the target contacts didn’t even recall the brand after clicking ads.
That implies that for some, the deals influenced by Influ2 within a few quarters justify the cost. The critical view is that Influ2 probably makes the most sense financially if your deal sizes are large (enterprise B2B deals worth $50k, $100k+ each). Spending, say, $50k a year on Influ2 to help close $1M in new business could pencil out. This isn’t a tool for the scrappy startup with $5k total ad budget; it’s for teams willing to invest serious money to get in front of hard-to-reach decision makers.
Influ2 enjoys a 4.6/5 average rating on G2 across 150+ reviews, which sounds stellar, but let’s dig into what users actually say.
What users applaud about Influ2:
Where users see pain points or limitations:
One alternative to Influ2 is ZenABM.
It is specifically designed for LinkedIn ABM, so it can either be a complete, lean and affordable alternative to Influ2 for teams that mainly advertise on LinkedIn.
Even for teams running multi-channel ABM, ZenABM can be a complementary layer to Influ2 or whichever bigger ABM suite they are using because of ZenABM’s unique features.
Let’s look at those features:
ZenABM integrates directly with the LinkedIn Ads API to pull account-specific data from all campaigns.
This allows you to identify precisely which target accounts are interacting with your LinkedIn ads (impressions, clicks, etc.), all mapped to individual companies.
Pro Tip: ZenABM can also reveal anonymous website visitors for free. Retarget them with inexpensive LinkedIn text ads, and ZenABM will identify the companies that saw your impressions.
ZenABM continuously updates engagement scores from ad interactions. You can monitor recent trends (like the past week) or historical patterns to identify accounts heating up.
These scores help marketing and sales prioritize high-value accounts for follow-up.
ZenABM enables you to define your ABM funnel stages (e.g., Identified → Aware → Engaged → Interested → Opportunity) and automatically classifies accounts using engagement and CRM information.
You can set your own thresholds for “Engaged” or “Interested,” and ZenABM will track stage transitions automatically.
This delivers full-funnel visibility like enterprise ABM platforms, highlighting where accounts stall and where progress accelerates.
ZenABM integrates bidirectionally with CRMs such as HubSpot (Salesforce available on higher plans).
LinkedIn engagement data feeds directly into your CRM as company-level properties, keeping sales teams informed:
ZenABM can auto-update account stages to “Interested” when engagement passes a set threshold and assign accounts to specific BDRs for follow-up.
ZenABM allows you to tag campaigns by theme (like “Feature A” vs. “Feature B”) and shows which accounts engage with which themes, revealing their priorities.
This is genuine first-party intent. Instead of paying for inferred keyword interest, you get direct proof like Account Z clicking “Feature A” ads, demonstrating actual buying interest.
These insights also sync to your CRM, supporting highly targeted outreach and relevant messaging.
Your sales reps can instantly see which topics or pain points each account reacts to most.
This feature is fairly unique to ZenABM, making it a worthwhile add-on even if you already have an existing subscription to some other ABM tool.
ZenABM also gives a breakdown of the specific job titles that interact with your ads.
Raw metrics, dwell time, full video funnel – all available out of the box.
ZenABM includes pre-built ABM dashboards linking ad exposure, engagement, funnel stages, and pipeline metrics.
With the newly rolled out custom webhooks, ZenABM can fit into any of your workflows as needed.
Plans start at $59/month for Starter, $159/month for Growth, $399/month for the Pro (AI) tier, and $479/month for the agency tier.
Even the highest tier costs under $6,000/year, far less than what Influ2.
All plans cover essential LinkedIn ABM functions, with higher tiers mostly expanding limits or adding Salesforce integration.
Pricing is flexible (monthly or annual with two months free), and a 37-day free trial allows teams to try before buying.
Influ2 brings an interesting twist to ABM with its person-based targeting, and for teams who can afford the high credit-driven pricing, it can deliver sharp visibility into individual buyer behavior.
But once you weigh the cost structure, the learning curve, and the mixed reliability of person-level signals, it becomes clear that it isn’t the universal answer for B2B marketers.
If your primary focus is LinkedIn ABM and you want first-party engagement insight, cleaner pricing, and a faster path to pipeline visibility, ZenABM is the more practical fit.
It delivers the core capabilities most teams actually need without the bulk or the surprise bills.
Whether you’re starting your ABM journey or looking to fill gaps in your current stack, it’s worth exploring ZenABM’s 37-day free trial.
