©2026 ZenABM - All Rights Reserved.
Most ABM teams obsess over ad creative and targeting – then send traffic to their homepage. I know because I did the same thing for months. Our LinkedIn ads were generating solid CTRs, our target account lists were dialed in, and we had engagement data flowing through ZenABM. But conversions? Flat.
The problem was never the ads. It was where those ads sent people.
In our companion post on LinkedIn ads landing pages, Tas Bober (founder of The Scroll Lab) shared her framework for building landing pages that convert LinkedIn traffic. This post goes one step further: real ABM landing page examples, broken down by type and personalization level, with analysis of what works and what falls flat.
After running ABM campaigns across dozens of B2B SaaS accounts through ZenABM and analyzing our 2026 LinkedIn ABM Performance Benchmarks, I’ve seen firsthand which landing page approaches drive pipeline – and which waste budget.
Before we look at examples, let’s address something I got wrong for a long time: treating LinkedIn landing pages the same as Google Ads landing pages.
They are fundamentally different. And ABM landing pages have their own unique requirements on top of that.
| Factor | Google Ads Landing Page | ABM Landing Page (LinkedIn) |
|---|---|---|
| Visitor intent | High – actively searching for solutions | Low/medium – interrupted while browsing feed |
| Audience size | Broad – thousands of potential visitors | Small – targeting specific account lists (50-500 companies) |
| Personalization | Keyword-level at most | Industry, cluster, or account-specific |
| Primary goal | Immediate conversion | Education, trust-building, stage progression |
| Impression value | Replaceable – another searcher will come | Precious – every impression on a target account counts |
Here’s what changed my thinking: with ABM, your audience is small and specific. You know who you’re targeting. If 200 companies are on your target account list and 50 of them click through to your landing page but bounce, you don’t get those impressions back cheaply. Every visit from a target account is an opportunity to move them from “Aware” to “Interested” in your ABM funnel.
The economics make this clear. Based on our analysis of 2,828 LinkedIn ads:
This means the landing page itself is doing heavy lifting. And if your landing page is generic, you’re burning through a small, valuable audience with nothing to show for it.
Not every ABM campaign needs a fully custom landing page for each target account. The right level of personalization depends on your list size, deal value, and resources.
I think of it as three tiers:
Best for: 100+ target accounts
Same page structure and core messaging. You swap out industry-specific examples, logos, and pain points. A landing page for your fintech segment uses fintech case studies and references compliance challenges. The one for healthcare SaaS references HIPAA and shows healthcare customer logos.
What this looks like in practice:
This is where most teams should start. It’s scalable, doesn’t require massive design resources, and still outperforms a generic page by a wide margin.
Best for: 20-100 target accounts
You group accounts into clusters that share similar pain points, tech stacks, or buying triggers – then build a landing page for each cluster. Maybe you have a cluster of mid-market companies currently using a specific competitor. Or a cluster of companies that recently raised Series B and are scaling their marketing teams.
What this looks like in practice:
This middle tier is where I’ve seen the highest ROI. You get meaningful personalization without the unsustainable effort of true one-to-one pages.
Best for: Top 10-20 target accounts
Full account-specific landing pages. The company name is in the headline. The page references their specific challenges (based on research). The case studies are from their direct competitors or peers. The ROI calculations use their company’s data points.
As Tas Bober puts it: “Build your ABM landing page like a business case.” These pages should read like a business proposal – not a marketing brochure. They should answer the specific question: “Why should [Company Name] care about this, given their current situation?”
What this looks like in practice:
The effort is high, but for your top-tier accounts with $100K+ deal potential, a custom landing page that converts even one additional account pays for itself many times over.
Now let’s look at the specific types of ABM landing pages and what makes each one work. Each type maps to a different stage in the buyer’s journey and a different level of audience warmth.
Best for: Cold/top-of-funnel ABM audiences – accounts in the “Identified” or early “Aware” stage.
These pages offer a free guide, report, template, or toolkit in exchange for minimal information. The goal isn’t to generate a sales-ready lead. It’s to start a relationship and provide enough value that the account remembers you.
What makes a strong content download ABM landing page:
Common mistakes I see: Asking for phone number, company size, and job title on a first-touch content download. The lead isn’t worth $811 in form friction when you can get the same person for $31-61 with an email-only form and enrich the rest later.
Best for: Mid-funnel ABM – accounts in the “Aware” or “Interested” stage who need education and trust-building.
Webinar pages work well in ABM because they combine content value with a time commitment signal. Someone who registers for a 45-minute webinar is more engaged than someone who downloads a PDF they may never read.
What makes a strong webinar registration ABM landing page:
We’ve run several webinar campaigns at ZenABM through our ABM Bootcamp series. The pages that performed best always had clear speaker credentials and a specific, outcome-focused title – not a generic topic.
Best for: Bottom-funnel ABM – retargeting accounts in the “Interested” or “Considering” stage who have already engaged with your content.
This is where I see the most wasted budget. Teams run demo request ads to cold ABM audiences who have never heard of them. Cold audiences don’t want a demo. They want to understand if you’re relevant to them first.
What makes a strong demo/trial ABM landing page:
Rule of thumb: Only show demo/trial pages to accounts that have already engaged with your content. In ZenABM, I track which accounts reach the “Interested” stage (5+ clicks or 10+ engagements) before adding them to demo retargeting campaigns. Sending demo ads to cold accounts is the fastest way to burn through a small ABM audience.
Best for: High-quality lead generation across funnel stages – especially one-to-few and one-to-one ABM.
Interactive tools – ROI calculators, assessment quizzes, benchmark comparisons – are the most underused ABM landing page type. They deliver immediate tangible value and generate high-quality leads because visitors self-qualify through the interaction.
What makes a strong interactive ABM landing page:
Example: a company selling sales enablement software builds an ROI calculator that asks for team size, current close rate, and average deal size. The output shows projected revenue increase. The visitor gets value. The company gets a highly qualified lead with self-reported data that’s more accurate than any enrichment tool.
Best for: ABM campaigns targeting accounts using competitor products – especially one-to-few campaigns built around tech stack data.
If you’re building target account lists based on technographic data (using Clay and BuiltWith, for example), competitor comparison landing pages are the natural destination. These accounts already use a solution in your category. They don’t need education about the problem. They need a reason to switch.
What makes a strong competitor comparison ABM landing page:
Message match is critical here. If your ad says “Looking for a [Competitor] alternative?” the landing page headline needs to reference that competitor directly. Don’t send them to a generic features page.
This concept from Tas Bober changed how I think about ABM landing page personalization, and I want to expand on it with real examples.
Most ABM teams personalize based on WHO: “Hey [Company Name], here’s why [Product] is right for you.” They stick the company name in the headline, add the company logo to the page, and call it personalized.
That’s surface-level personalization. It might get a second glance, but it doesn’t drive conversions.
The better approach: personalize based on WHERE the account is in their buyer’s journey.
Here’s what this looks like in practice:
| Buyer Journey Stage | What They Need | Landing Page Type | Personalization Focus |
|---|---|---|---|
| Problem Unaware | Education about the problem | Content download (guide/report) | Industry-specific examples of the problem |
| Problem Aware | Understanding of solutions | Webinar / assessment | Pain points specific to their segment |
| Solution Aware | Evaluation criteria | Comparison / calculator | Competitor context, ROI specific to their size |
| Ready to Evaluate | Hands-on experience | Demo / free trial | Use cases relevant to their role and challenges |
Tas recommends focusing on 2 areas from the buyer’s journey at most. Don’t try to build a landing page that works for every stage. That’s how you end up with a generic page that works for nobody.
The practical takeaway: when you set up your ABM campaigns in LinkedIn, segment by buying stage – not by company name. An account in the “Aware” stage should see different ads leading to different landing pages than an account in the “Considering” stage, regardless of whether both are Fortune 500 companies.
Based on Tas Bober’s framework (covered in detail in our companion post), here’s the landing page structure that works for ABM. I’ve added ABM-specific notes to each section.
| Section | What to Include | ABM-Specific Notes |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Above the Fold | Eyebrow label (“FREE GUIDE”), headline under 10 words, subheadline, form, action-focused button | For one-to-one: include company name. For one-to-few: reference the cluster pain point. For one-to-many: use industry language. |
| 2. Trust Bar | 4-6 customer logos + “Trusted by X companies” | Show logos your target accounts will recognize – ideally from their industry or peer group. For one-to-one, show their direct competitors. |
| 3. What’s Inside | 4-6 bullet points with specific outcomes. Preview image of the asset. | Frame outcomes in terms relevant to the target segment. “Reduce CAC for fintech SaaS” not “Reduce CAC.” |
| 4. Who It’s For | “This is for you if…” and optionally “This is NOT for you if…” | Critical for ABM – this section qualifies the visitor. Reference specific roles, company stages, or challenges that match your target list. |
| 5. Social Proof | 2-3 testimonials with specific results, photos, names, titles | Match testimonials to the visitor’s industry or company size. A 50-person startup doesn’t care about an enterprise case study. |
| 6. FAQ | 4-6 common objections answered. Make this prominent. | FAQ is the most-clicked element on B2B landing pages. Include ABM-specific objections like “What if we already have a solution?” |
| 7. About Us | 2-3 sentences about your company + credibility indicators | Keeps visitors from leaving the page to research you. For ABM, mention relevant customers or industry experience. |
| 8. Final CTA | Repeat the main offer + form or anchor link to top form | Same CTA as above the fold. Don’t introduce a new ask at the bottom. |
Two critical rules from Tas Bober that apply to every section:
Here’s where most ABM teams get stuck: they measure landing page performance the same way they measure demand gen pages. Aggregate conversion rate. Total leads. Cost per lead.
Those metrics are incomplete for ABM. They tell you how the page performs in general – but not whether it’s converting the accounts you actually care about.
Tas Bober’s biggest insight: conversions are a lagging indicator. By the time someone fills out your form, they’ve already done most of their research. What you should track is how visitors interact with the page before they convert (or don’t).
Set up tracking for:
This is where ABM measurement differs from everything else. You need to know:
You can get account-level landing page data two ways:
1. LinkedIn Text Ads for free website visitor deanonymization. Text Ads cost around $2 CPM. When combined with LinkedIn’s website audience matching, you can identify which companies from your target list are visiting your landing pages – without paying for expensive deanonymization tools.
2. ZenABM for account-level analytics. ZenABM connects your LinkedIn ad engagement data to your target account list, so you can see which companies are engaging with specific campaigns – including which ones clicked through to your landing pages. This is the data I use to decide which accounts are ready for demo retargeting and which need more top-of-funnel content.
The biggest objection I hear: “We can’t build a custom landing page for every account.” And you shouldn’t try to. Here’s how to scale without losing personalization quality.
Build 3-5 industry-level landing page variations first. Run campaigns for 30-60 days. See which industries convert best. Then build one-to-few variations for your top-performing segments.
This is what Tas Bober means when she says “Look for commonalities, but not the wrong ones.” The right commonalities are shared pain points, buying triggers, and solution requirements – not surface-level attributes like company size or geography.
Design your landing pages with swappable modules:
With this modular approach, you can create 10+ “personalized” landing page variations from 5-6 reusable components.
For teams that want to scale beyond manual page creation, tools like Mutiny and Userled allow you to serve different content on the same URL based on the visitor’s company, industry, or ABM list membership.
This means one landing page URL with dynamic content that changes based on who’s visiting. A visitor from a healthcare company sees healthcare logos, case studies, and pain points. A visitor from fintech sees fintech content. Same URL, different experience.
I’ve seen teams use this approach to “create” 50+ personalized landing page experiences from a single base template. The key is having enough content variants (case studies, testimonials, use cases) to populate the dynamic sections meaningfully.
After reviewing hundreds of ABM campaigns through ZenABM, these are the mistakes I see again and again:
Mistake #1: Sending traffic to your homepage. Your homepage serves everyone – investors, job candidates, existing customers, potential buyers. It’s not designed for a specific ABM audience with a specific pain point. Build a dedicated page. Even a simple one outperforms a homepage for ABM traffic.
Mistake #2: Using Google Ads landing pages for LinkedIn traffic. Google visitors are actively searching for a solution. LinkedIn visitors were scrolling their feed and your ad caught their eye. Different intent levels require different messaging. LinkedIn landing pages need more context, more trust signals, and lower friction than Google pages.
Mistake #3: Over-personalizing on company name, under-personalizing on buying stage. Putting “[Company Name], here’s your custom report” in the headline feels personalized, but if the content isn’t relevant to where they are in their buying journey, the personalization is cosmetic. A page that speaks to their specific pain point converts better than a page that mentions their name but offers generic content.
Mistake #4: Too many form fields for cold audiences. For first-touch ABM campaigns, email is enough. Every additional required field (phone, company size, budget, timeline) reduces conversions. Collect the email, enrich the rest with Clay or your CRM, and add more form fields for warmer audiences in retargeting campaigns.
Mistake #5: No message match between ad and landing page. Your ad promises “7 LinkedIn ABM Templates” and your landing page headline says “Welcome to Our Resource Center.” Trust breaks immediately. The landing page headline should echo the ad copy. If the ad shows a specific visual, use the same visual on the landing page.
Mistake #6: Missing FAQ section. Tas Bober’s data consistently shows the FAQ block is the most interacted-with section on B2B landing pages. One of her clients saw a 265% conversion increase by moving the FAQ from a buried bottom section to a prominent position. If your ABM landing page doesn’t have an FAQ section, add one today.
Mistake #7: No “About Us” section. ABM visitors often don’t know your company well. If they have to leave your landing page to Google who you are, you’ve lost them. A 2-3 sentence company description with credibility indicators keeps them on the page and builds trust without an extra click.
Here’s the decision framework I use when planning ABM landing pages for a new campaign:
| Question | Answer | Action |
|---|---|---|
| How many target accounts? | 100+ | One-to-many (industry-level pages) |
| How many target accounts? | 20-100 | One-to-few (cluster pages) |
| How many target accounts? | 10-20 high-value | One-to-one (account-specific pages) |
| Are accounts cold or warm? | Cold (Identified/Aware) | Content download or webinar page |
| Are accounts cold or warm? | Warm (Interested) | Calculator, assessment, or comparison page |
| Are accounts cold or warm? | Hot (Considering) | Demo request or free trial page |
| Which ad format? | TLAs ($3.06/LP click) | Best for driving volume to content/webinar pages |
| Which ad format? | Single Image ($13.23/LP click) | Best for retargeting warm accounts to demo pages |
The key insight: your landing page strategy should mirror your ABM funnel stages. Accounts progress from content consumption to demo requests as they move through your funnel. Your landing pages should progress with them.
What makes an ABM landing page different from a regular landing page?
ABM landing pages are built for a known, specific audience – not broad traffic. This means personalization matters more (you know who you’re targeting), every impression is more valuable (small audience), and the goal is often stage progression rather than immediate conversion. ABM landing pages should match the visitor’s buying stage and include proof points relevant to their industry or company profile.
How many ABM landing page variations do I need?
Start with 3-5 industry-level variations (one-to-many). That covers most B2B ABM programs with 100+ target accounts. If you’re running a focused campaign with 20-100 accounts, build 5-10 cluster-level variations. Only invest in true one-to-one pages for your top 10-20 accounts where deal sizes justify the effort. You can always add more variations as you learn which segments convert best.
Should I use Lead Gen Forms or landing pages for LinkedIn ABM?
Landing pages. Our analysis of 2,828 LinkedIn ads shows landing pages generate leads at $31-61 each, while Lead Gen Forms cost $811 per lead. Lead Gen Forms also give you less data about how visitors interact with your content (no scroll tracking, no heatmaps, no account-level page analytics). The only scenario where Lead Gen Forms make sense is when you need maximum simplicity and have no landing page infrastructure at all.
How do I know which companies visited my ABM landing page?
Two practical approaches: First, use LinkedIn Text Ads for free website visitor deanonymization at around $2 CPM. Second, use ZenABM to connect LinkedIn ad engagement data to your target account list, so you can see which companies clicked through to your landing pages and how they engaged with specific campaigns. This account-level visibility is what separates ABM measurement from traditional page analytics.
What’s the most important element on an ABM landing page?
Message match between the ad and the landing page headline. If your ad promises one thing and the landing page delivers something different, trust breaks immediately and visitors bounce. After message match, the FAQ section is the most impactful element – Tas Bober’s data shows it’s consistently the most-clicked section on B2B landing pages, and one client saw a 265% conversion lift by making their FAQ more prominent.
