Calculate Your LinkedIn Ads ABM Budget using our free calculator

Account-Based Marketing (ABM) vs Traditional Marketing: A Comprehensive Comparison19 min read

Table of Contents

Account-Based Marketing (ABM) vs Traditional Marketing: A Comprehensive Comparison

Okay, so maybe you are looking for a heated debate: Account-Based Marketing vs. Traditional Marketing.

However, the truth is that none of them is objectively better than the other. And you don’t always have to choose one.

Some businesses can run both simultaneously, while for some only one of them is suited.

I have taken up all these questions in this article and compared both ABM and traditional marketing (mainly conventional lead generation), so you can choose the strategy that fits your goals.

Plus, there’s an account on how ZenABM can help you if you choose ABM.

Read on…

ABM vs Traditional Marketing: Quick Summary

  • 1. Targeting Approach
    Traditional: Broad targeting, volume-driven outreach.
    ABM: Focused on high-value, pre-qualified accounts only.
  • 2. Personalization
    Traditional: Generic, standardized messaging for all.
    ABM: Highly personalized content tailored to each account.
  • 3. Funnel Structure
    Traditional: Classic top-down funnel model.
    ABM: Flipped funnel – start narrow, expand influence within accounts.
  • 4. Success Metrics
    Traditional: Impressions, MQLs, CPL, CTR.
    ABM: Account engagement, opportunity creation, ACV, revenue per account.
  • 5. Sales & Marketing Alignment
    Traditional: Often siloed; misalignment common.
    ABM: Unified GTM motion with shared targets and strategy.
  • 6. Execution Complexity
    Traditional: Easier to scale quickly; minimal customization.
    ABM: Requires deep research, planning, and orchestration.
  • 7. When to Use Traditional Marketing
    – For brand awareness or lead volume
    – When selling low-cost or self-serve products
    – To test new markets or messaging
  • 8. When to Use ABM
    – For complex, high-value B2B sales
    – To engage multi-stakeholder buying committees
    – When sales and marketing need tight alignment
  • 9. Hybrid Approach Works Best
    Run both in parallel: traditional for inbound, ABM for outbound enterprise wins.
  • 10. Pro Tip: Use ZenABM for LinkedIn ABM
    Enables account-level engagement tracking, scoring, CRM sync, automated BDR handoffs, and full-funnel ROI analytics.
  • 11. Final Insight
    Traditional marketing fills the funnel. ABM flips the funnel and fills your pipeline with revenue.

What’s Traditional Marketing?

Traditional marketing refers to broad-reach marketing methods businesses have used for decades to promote products or services.

This included classic offline channels like print ads, TV/radio commercials, direct mail, billboards, and cold calls.

Now it also includes online channels like SEO-led lead generation, email blasts, social campaigns on platforms like LinkedIn, and random display ads.

But this mindset remains common here: Casting a wide net to capture as many leads as possible in the funnel. Marketers call it the “spray and pray” method, and rightly so!

Success in this approach is often measured in aggregate metrics like:

  • number of impressions,
  • click-through rates,
  • lead volume (no. of MQLs generated), and
  • cost per lead.

The Pros of Traditional Marketing

Traditional methods offer several benefits in the right scenarios:

  • First, they provide a broad audience reach: channels like TV, radio, print, and mass email can expose your brand to a large, diverse population. Same goes for digital channels like SEO and email blasts. This makes traditional marketing ideal for brand awareness campaigns or products with mass appeal.
  • Secondly, traditional marketing can be cost-effective for mass marketing. The cost per lead is often lower when casting a wide net. For example, a single campaign can yield thousands of leads at a relatively low per-lead cost because it’s not heavily customized.
  • Traditional tactics also tend to be quick to implement and scale; you can launch a broad ad campaign or send a mailer to thousands of contacts relatively fast.
  • Additionally, traditional marketing builds widespread brand recognition. Consistent exposure through mass channels helps cement a brand’s presence in consumers’ minds.
  • For certain products, especially B2C or lower-priced B2B tools, traditional “spray and pray” marketing can even trigger impulse buys or quick conversions, thanks to the sheer volume of impressions.

In summary, traditional marketing is about reach, volume, and awareness, making it a viable choice when your goal is to cast a wide net and attract as many potential customers as possible with a unified message.

The Cons of Traditional Marketing

So, yes, traditional marketing aces awareness.

But the broad-brush approach has downsides.

Because messaging is generalized to appeal to a wide audience, it lacks personalization, which can result in lower engagement from any individual prospect.

You might get many leads, but they may be less qualified or less interested on average.

Traditional marketing can also lead to misalignment between marketing and sales. In the traditional approach, Marketing just cares about throwing leads to the other side, and Sales is always found complaining that the MQLs weren’t qualified enough.

This approach can be inefficient for companies selling complex, high-value B2B solutions where only a few accounts really matter.

In such cases, a lot of marketing spend on broad outreach may be “wasted” on people who will never convert into big-ticket customers.

These challenges set the stage for the more focused alternative: Account-Based Marketing.

What is Account-Based Marketing (ABM)?

Account-Based Marketing (ABM) is a highly targeted, personalized marketing strategy that focuses on engaging specific companies (accounts) rather than casting a wide net to a broad audience.

ABM turns the traditional demand-gen funnel on its head:

ABM is about flipping the funnel used in traditional marketing

Instead of starting with mass outreach to generate leads, ABM starts by identifying a select list of target accounts (often high-value prospects or strategic customers) and then personalizing campaigns explicitly for those accounts.

ABM treats each target account as its own market.

Also, in ABM, marketing and sales teams work together closely to win and grow those specific accounts by delivering personalized content and experiences to key stakeholders at each account.

ABM’s Core Principles and Benefits

Let’s look at the core principles of ABM that answer the ABM versus Traditional Marketing debate:

Focused Targeting

ABM zeroes in on a limited number of high-value accounts that have the greatest potential value. Instead of seeking “as many leads as possible,” ABM marketers prioritize quality over quantity.

These target accounts are often chosen based on strategic fit, revenue potential, or other factors indicating they’re ideal customers (sometimes using an Ideal Customer Profile as a guide).

Personalization at Scale and Higher Conversion Rates

Campaigns are then customized for each target account (or clusters of very similar accounts). ABM content speaks directly to an account’s specific business challenges, needs, and stakeholders.

Rather than generic slogans, ABM might deliver a whitepaper addressing Company X’s industry pain points, or even something as tailored as a personal video or a customized demo for that account.

This high level of relevance drives greater engagement, and that in turn boosts conversion rates.

Statistical proof: 75% of marketers in one survey reported higher engagement from ABM campaigns than from broad marketing initiatives.

An Engagio report showed that 75% of marketers reported higher engagement from account-based marketing (ABM) campaigns than broad traditional marketing campaigns

Sales and Marketing Alignment

Dave Rigotti on sales-marketing alignment
Marketing & sales alignment is the essence of ABM, says Dave Rigotti, an ABM expert

ABM blurs the line between marketing and sales teams.

Both collaborate from the start to define target accounts, craft personalized outreach, and move accounts through the pipeline together.

This alignment ensures that marketing efforts are directly supporting sales goals (and vice versa) on the same set of accounts.

So the blame game of “Sales isn’t good enough at closing deals”, or “Marketing always throws bad leads at us” is done away with in ABM!

Account Lifecycle Focus

Unlike one-off lead generation, ABM has a long-term view. It’s not just about acquiring a new account, but also about nurturing and expanding that account’s value over time.

Marketers practising ABM often continue personalized marketing to existing clients for upselling, cross-selling, and retention. In other words, the marketing doesn’t stop at the sale.

Data-Driven and Measurable

ABM relies on data and analytics to choose accounts and measure success. Marketers use intent data, firmographic data, and engagement metrics to select target accounts and tailor content.

Success metrics in ABM also differ from traditional marketing: instead of just counting leads, ABM looks at account-specific metrics like:

  • account engagement score,
  • opportunity creation within target accounts,
  • deal velocity, average contract value (ACV),
  • and revenue growth in those accounts.

By tracking these, ABM provides clear insight into how marketing efforts are impacting the pipeline and revenue at the account level.

Quick Fact: Account-Based Marketing isn’t something totally new. It builds on the idea of one-to-one marketing. The term “Account-Based Marketing” was officially coined in 2003 by the IT Services Marketing Association (ITSMA), and the flipped funnel was officially recognized:

ITSMA's diagram of ABM funnel

ABM in Action: A Quick Example

Consider a famous example from Engagio, an ABM-focused software company. Engagio wanted to get the attention of executives at a set of target prospect companies during Dreamforce (Salesforce’s big conference).

Instead of sending generic emails, Engagio created custom bobblehead dolls resembling each target company’s key decision-makers and brought these personalized gifts to the conference.

Engagio used personalized bobbleheads to stand out to their target clients. This is a perfect example to illustrate ABM vs Traditional marketing.
Source

They emailed each target account with a photo of the bobblehead, inviting them to stop by the Engagio booth to pick it up.

This playful, highly personalized campaign helped Engagio stand out and engage their dream accounts in a way traditional ads never could.

Such examples show ABM vs traditional marketing ethos, where ABM is about:

  • knowing your account,
  • making them feel uniquely understood,
  • and earning a chance to win their business.

On the other end of the spectrum, another company, Intridea, famously ran a personalized billboard across the street from a single target client’s office, Ogilvy, with a message directed just at them.

Intridea's billboard ad that they made to target Ogilvy and put directly in front of the NYC office of Ogilvy
Source

Bold moves like this underline how ABM flips the script from reaching many anonymously to reaching the right one memorably.

ABM vs Traditional Marketing: Key Differences

While both traditional marketing and ABM ultimately aim to grow revenue, they differ dramatically in strategy and execution.

Here are the key differences separating ABM from a conventional marketing approach:

Target Audience Scope

Traditional marketing targets a broad audience or market segment, seeking to attract as many prospects as possible into the funnel.

ABM, in contrast, is highly selective, focusing on specific accounts (often just a few dozen or a few hundred companies) that are pre-qualified as high-value. In traditional B2B campaigns, you might blast an email to 10,000 contacts hoping 5% respond; in ABM, you might hand-pick 50 companies and pursue them relentlessly with personalized outreach.

ABM’s mantra is quality over quantity: It would rather have five highly engaged target accounts than 500 lukewarm random leads.

Personalization of Messaging

Because of that scope difference, the level of personalization varies greatly. Traditional marketing often uses one-size-fits-all messaging and content for the masses. ABM crafts account-specific content that speaks directly to an individual company’s needs and pain points.

For example, a traditional approach might publish a generic whitepaper, whereas an ABM approach might tailor that whitepaper’s intro to each industry or even include the target company’s name and context in it.

This personalization extends to channels as well. ABM might involve custom microsites or landing pages for each account. For instance, tools like Demandbase help with this:

Demandbase website personalization

Or personalized emails referencing the prospect’s company situation, or even custom gifts and event invitations.

The result is that prospects see content that feels uniquely relevant to them, which increases engagement.

The Funnel Approach

Perhaps the most visual difference is the marketing funnel orientation – we discussed this before in the article.

Traditional marketing fills the top of the funnel with a wide audience and then filters down; many leads enter, and a few convert at the bottom.

ABM inverts the funnel: It starts with a narrow list of target accounts at the “top” (actually the bottom point of a flipped funnel) and focuses efforts on expanding engagement within those accounts.

ABM vs Traditional Marketing - the flipping of the funnel on its head
Source: Revnew

Success Metrics

Traditional marketing metrics focus on volume and efficiency like number of leads generated, cost per lead, conversion rates through each funnel stage, impressions, and overall campaign ROI. ABM metrics focus on depth and impact within target accounts.

For ABM, key metrics include account engagement scores (are the right people at the account spending time with our content?), number of qualified meetings or opportunities at each target account, deal win-rate for targeted vs. non-targeted accounts, expansion revenue (upsell/cross-sell) in those accounts, and overall revenue influenced by ABM efforts.

For example, rather than bragging about “5,000 leads generated,” an ABM program might report “Engaged 40 out of 50 target accounts, created 30 new opportunities, and increased average deal size by 20%.”

Quick Statistic: Demandbase’s benchmark report 2024 found that 81% of marketers say ABM delivers a higher return on investment compared to other marketing initiatives.

Demandbase's study reports that ABM wins in the ABM vs Traditional Marketing's race of higher returns

Sales Integration

Traditional marketing often operates somewhat separately from sales. Marketing generates leads, then hands them off to sales to work.

And then the blame game starts…

The sales and marketing blame game in traditional marketing

ABM, by necessity, requires tight integration with the sales team at every step

Marketing and sales jointly select target accounts, coordinate outreach (marketing might warm up an account with tailored ads and content before sales calls, for instance), and share insights.

This synergy means that in ABM, marketing is more accountable for real sales outcomes (pipeline and revenue), and sales teams are more involved in upfront marketing planning.

The resulting alignment ensures a better experience for the prospect too. They aren’t receiving disconnected messages from marketing and sales, but rather a unified, account-specific approach.

Scope of Campaigns

In traditional marketing, campaigns are often run at the segment or market level. E.g. a campaign targeting “mid-size tech companies” or “finance professionals” as a group. ABM campaigns are often individualized at the account level.

There are actually tiers of ABM approach: One-to-One ABM (completely bespoke campaigns for single accounts), One-to-Few (personalized campaigns targeting small clusters of similar accounts), and One-to-Many (using technology to personalize marketing to hundreds of accounts in a scalable way).

But even one-to-many ABM involves segmentation far narrower than typical broad marketing.

You might personalize content for 100 named accounts in the software industry, rather than blanket the whole industry.

Let Me Explain ABM vs Traditional Marketing with a Hypothetical Example

Ok, so imagine you have launched a SaaS business.

Now, at this point, you’ll start with making a fancy blog with a lot of effort and a lot of SEO keywords.

The, you’ll see only quality isn’t enough, and you’ll end up buying backlinks (good backlinks start at $250/unit).

And then you’ll sit waiting for leads to land on pages, fill forms, etc. – and you’ll blast them with e-mails.

Now, here I want to break something really important to you: I, as a writer, have been downloading a lot of lead magnets from different high-tech SaaS websites. But as a freelance writer, I was never their ICP.

In fact, Factors.ai even called me (please leave poor visitors like me with only educational intent alone) – what an utter waste of resources. Just think, why would a writer buy an ABM tool?

And this is exactly where traditional marketing sucks. You passively wait for leads, then run behind MQLs with a thousand shiny different tactics, only to realize that this lead won’t ever buy what you sell.

And this is exactly where ABM is great. As Yulia Olennikova (marketing expert) points out, “The biggest value of ABM is not what you do, but what you don’t”

Yulia Olennikova talks about how ABM difts away from random shiny tactics and that is the very reason of its success in generation a high quality pipeline.

In ABM, you don’t:

  • pray for leads to come to you. You pursue the right accounts actively.
  • try every other shiny tactic you see on LinkedIn.
  • pursue random leads with only educational intent until they flag you as spam.

In ABM:

  • You sit with the sales team to make a list of accounts that fit your ICP and both sales and marketing, then pursue the same list of accounts.
  • There’s an extreme amount of background research, so you never target random leads.
  • You target accounts and not leads, and that helps because B2B and B2C sales cycles aren’t the same: b2b vs b2c sales cycleB2B decisions are made by Decision Making Units (DMUs)/Buying Committees, not individuals. And these committees can be large. ABM experts like Debjit Sen point out that 5-6 decision makers in a single account is the norm now:Debjit Sen, an experienced ABM marketer and the founder of an ABM agency points out in his LinkedIn post that one should never underestimate the size of buying teamsMoreover, 6sense’s B2B Buyer Experience Report pushes the average DMU size further to 11! So, traditional marketing’s MQL obsession makes no sense while targeting huge accounts for selling complex B2B solutions.

When to Choose ABM vs Traditional Marketing

You should go for ABM if:

  • Your deals are high‑value or enterprise‑level. A handful of $100K+ accounts can move the needle.
  • Your sales cycles are long and complex, involving multiple stakeholders.
  • You want tight sales–marketing alignment around a shared list of target accounts.
  • You need to expand and retain key customers through upsell and cross‑sell motions.
  • You have the resources to research accounts, craft bespoke content, and coordinate with sales.

You should go for Traditional Marketing if:

  • You need broad reach and volume—brand awareness or thousands of smaller leads.
  • Your product is self‑serve or low‑cost, allowing customers to onboard themselves.
  • You’re testing new markets or messaging before investing in deeper account plays.
  • You need fast, scalable campaigns with minimal bespoke asset creation.
  • Your team has limited bandwidth or budget for deep personalization.

And, yes, you can run them both too. In fact, if you already have a good demand generation motion that’s performing great, you of course don’t have to stop it. You can start ABM simultaneously and it will help you increase your ACV.

ZenABM for Running ABM on LinkedIn

If you are thinking of running ABM now, I suggest two things:

And regarding ‘Why use ZenABM?’, here’s why:

Company-level Engagement Tracking Per Campaign Using LinkedIn’s Official API

ZenABM pulls company level LinkedIn ad engagement data (impressions, clicks, and engagements) and ad spend for each of your LinkedIn ad campaign:

ZenABM dashboard showing company-level ads engagement data per campaign by pulling first party intent signals from LinkedIn API
ZenABM dashboard showing company-level ads engagement data per campaign by pulling first party intent signals from LinkedIn API
Company-level LinkedIn ad engagement data for each campiagn for a selected time period in ZenABM
Company-level LinkedIn ad engagement data for each campiagn for a selected time period in ZenABM

Engagement-Based Lead Scoring and ABM Stage Tracking

Apart from giving you raw engagement data of each company with each campaign, ZenABM sums up the historic and current engagement rate of all companies across all your ad campaigns to give you a lead score – a score telling you how aware or enagaged a company is with your overall brand and campaign.

ZenABM does lead scoring based on both current and all-time engagement levels

Plus, based on these engagements and your CRM data, ZenABM assigns an ABM stage to each account.

The best part? The engagement thresholds for these ABM stages are customizable at the user’s end:

ABM stage tracking in ZenABM

Automated BDR Assignment

We just saw that ZenABM tracks the ABM stage of each account based on engagement and CRM data.

To add more convenience for your sales team, ZenABM assigns hot accounts (accounts that have reached the interested stage) to your BDRs in your CRM:

ZenABM assigns your BDRs to accounts in the "interested" st
ZenABM assigns hot accounts to BDRs in the “interested” stage

so, your BDR outreach is immediate to hot accounts without manual daily look ups and manual alerts to your BDRs in, say, Slack.

Two-Way CRM Integration

While your run ABM on LinkedIn, your marketing team will live in ZenABM and MAPs, but sales team prefer their comfort zone – the CRM.

Well, for bridging the gap and eliminating manual data downloads and uploads, ZenABM automatically pushes all engagement data for accounts as company properties to your CRM:

LinkedIn ad data pushed to company lists in the HubSpot CRM using ZenABM
LinkedIn ad data pushed to company lists in the HubSpot CRM using ZenABM

And as for the other way of this two-way CRM integration, ZenABM matches engaged companies to the deals in your CRM and pulls the deal value of each company.

Plug-and-Play ABM Analytics and ROI Attribution Dashboards

ZenABM, empowered with its company matching and deal-value-pulling feature, provides you with ready-made ABM analytics and ROI attribution dashboards.

  • You can see the ad performance at all levels including ABM campaigns, LinkedIn campaign groups, and individual LinkedIn ad campaigns:ABM campaign metrics dashboard in ZenABMLinkedIn campaign metrics dashboard in ZenABM
  • Plus, as it has both the deal value and the ad spend for each company and campaign, it calculates revenue metrics, campaign effectiveness metrics like ROAS, pipeline per dollar spent etc. and also shows you the pipeline graphically: ABM analytics dashboard in ZenABM

Intent-Based ABM

Many pro ABMers use third-party tools like Bombora or ABM giants like Demandbase or RollWorks to find the qualitative intent (the pain-point, the feature, or the offer that the prospect is interested in). They do this by tracking the keywords being searched by accounts’ members:

You can choose your preferred intent keywords or topics from the vast repository of keywords tracked by RollWorks

But I suggest a better way: Stop paying for third-party data and embed qualitative intent in your ads themsleves which you are already paying for anyways.

For instance, if you have a product management SaaS, make different ad campaigns for different intents like product analytics, onboarding, session recording, all-in-one, etc.

Something like this:

NEW ABM Campaign Structure

Then, tag each campaign with intent in ZenABM, and ZenABM will tell you the qualitative intent of each company:

Company intent signals

It will also group all companies with similar intent together for your convenience:

ZenABM Intent data

PLus, ZenABM will also push intent as company-property to your CRM:

Pushing intent as property in ZenABM
Pushing intent as property in ZenABM

So, now your BDRs won’t just know the hot accounts, but also what to talk about with the accounts during the outreach.

Funnel-Leak Analysis

ABM campaign effectiveness and number of companies in each stage in a given time period being shown in ZenABM

ZenABM clearly maps out the number of companies in each stage – from initial to final stages- and also how they move. This helps you find where the friction is.

For instance, if a lot of companies are moving from ‘aware’ to ‘interested’ but don’t move out of ‘interested’, you know where the friction is and can act accordingly.

ABM vs Traditional Marketing: Conclusion

ABM vs Traditional Marketing isn’t a rivalry. It’s a strategic choice based on your business model, deal size, and buyer behavior.

Traditional marketing is great for reach, awareness, and high-volume, low-touch sales. But if you’re in B2B, chasing six-figure deals with 5+ decision-makers, you can’t afford to spray and pray.

That’s where ABM shines. It’s precise, personalized, and built for pipeline, not pageviews. You don’t chase leads. You pursue the right accounts with purpose, insight, and alignment.

And if you’re running ABM on LinkedIn, don’t guess. Use a tool like ZenABM to track real engagement, score intent, sync with your CRM, and enable your BDRs to strike while the account is hot.

Try ZenABM now for free or book a demo.

Get the best week's content