# LinkedIn Single Image Ads Benchmarks 2026: CTR, CPC, and CPM Data

> Single image ads eat up 61.87% of all LinkedIn ad budgets. They are the dominant format by a wide margin – and yet most teams have no idea whether their numbers are good, average, or terrible.

Author: Emilia Korczynska
Published: 2026-02-16
Updated: 2026-02-16
Categories: Ad Formats & Creatives
Source: https://zenabm.com/blog/linkedin-single-image-ads-benchmarks

---

![LinkedIn Single Image Ads CTR Benchmark cover showing a sample single image ad about broken ABM attribution](https://cdn.zenabm.com/media/LinkedIn-Single-Image-Ads-CTR-Benchmark.png)

Single image ads eat up 61.87% of all LinkedIn ad budgets. They are the dominant format by a wide margin – and yet most teams have no idea whether their numbers are good, average, or terrible.

I wrote this **Linkedin Single Image ads benchmarks post** from the [ZenABM 2026 LinkedIn ABM Benchmarks Report](/blog/linkedin-abm-performance-benchmarks-report-2026) – 2,828 ads across 211 companies and $5.5M in total spend. Below you will find the median CTR, CPC, CPM, and dwell time for single image ads, how they compare to other LinkedIn ad formats, and what the top-performing creatives have in common.

![Single image ads benchmarks and patterns](https://cdn.zenabm.com/media/Single-image-ads-benchmarks-and-pattersn.png)

If you are running LinkedIn ads and spending real budget on single image ads, use these numbers to audit your own performance.

## LinkedIn Single Image Ads Benchmarks – Key Takeaways

- **Median CTR is 0.42%.** If you are above that, you are outperforming the majority of LinkedIn advertisers. If you are below 0.30%, it is time to audit creative and targeting.
- **Median CPC is $13.23.** Expect to pay roughly $250-$500 per conversion on mid-funnel offers when factoring in landing page conversion rates.
- **Single image ads are expensive for impressions at $59.15 CPM.** If awareness is your goal, consider video ($38.94 CPM) or text ads (\~$2 CPM) instead.
- **They are 77% more expensive per click than Thought [Leader Ads.](/blog/linkedin-thought-leader-ads-examples)** Consider shifting 10-20% of your single image budget toward TLAs if you have the content to support it.
- **Budget allocation is lopsided.** The average company spends 61.87% on single image ads. Diversifying into carousels and TLAs typically improves overall cost efficiency.
- [**Top creatives follow](/blog/linkedin-ads-experts-consultants) patterns.** Problem-solution framing, social proof, before/after comparisons, and product screenshots are the consistent winners.
- **Refresh every 4-6 weeks.** Creative fatigue is measurable and consistent across the dataset. Do not let your ads run stale.

## LinkedIn Single Image Ads Benchmarks at a Glance

Here is the full picture. These are median values from our dataset – meaning half of all single image ads performed better, and half performed worse.

| Metric | Median Value | What It Means |
| **CTR (Click-Through Rate)** | 0.42% | About 4 [clicks per 1,000 impressions](/blog/linkedin-ad-roi-attribution-clicks-vs-impressions) |
| **CPC (Cost Per Click)** | $13.23 | Each landing page click costs roughly $13 |
| **CPM (Cost Per 1,000 Impressions)** | $59.15 | The most expensive impression cost of any in-feed format |
| **Dwell Time** | 3.64 seconds | How long users pause on the ad in their feed |
| **Efficiency Score** | 3.2 / 10 | Low – driven by high CPM relative to CTR |
| **Budget Share** | 61.87% | The dominant format across LinkedIn ad budgets |

The efficiency score stands out. At 3.2 out of 10, single image ads are the least cost-efficient format for driving landing page clicks. They deliver clicks – but at a premium price compared to formats like [Thought Leader Ads](/blog/running-abm-on-linkedin-the-ultimate-guide), which hit $2.29 median CPC.

That does not mean you should stop using them. It means you need to understand exactly what you are paying for and optimize accordingly.

## Single Image Ads CTR Benchmark

The median CTR for [LinkedIn single image ads](/blog/linkedin-single-image-ads-ultimate-guide) is **0.42%**. That is roughly 4 clicks for every 1,000 impressions served.

![ZenABM table of LinkedIn single image ad benchmarks with median CTR 0.42%, CPC $13.23 and CPM $59.15](https://cdn.zenabm.com/media/ZenABM-linkedin-single-image-ads-performance.png)

Here is how CTR distributes across the dataset:

| CTR Range | Performance Tier | What to Do |
| Below 0.20% | Poor | Pause and rework creative and targeting |
| 0.20% – 0.35% | Below Average | Test new visuals and headline copy |
| 0.35% – 0.50% | Average | You are in the middle of the pack |
| 0.50% – 0.80% | Above Average | Good [performance – optimize](/use-cases/linkedin-campaign-management-optimization) around the edges |
| 0.80% – 1.20% | Strong | Top 15% of single image ads |
| Above 1.20% | Exceptional | Top 5% – document what you did and replicate it |

A few things I have learned about CTR from analyzing this data:

- **Audience size matters.** [ABM campaigns targeting small account](/blog/abm-strategy-types) lists (under 5,000 members) tend to see slightly lower CTRs because the same people see the ads repeatedly. [Impression capping](/blog/linkedin-ads-impression-capping) helps here.
- **Creative fatigue is real.** Ads older than 4-6 weeks consistently drop below the 0.35% threshold. Refresh your creatives monthly.
- **Funnel stage affects CTR.** Top-of-funnel awareness ads (thought leadership, educational content) tend to outperform bottom-funnel conversion ads on CTR. But CTR alone does not tell the full story – what matters is what happens after the click.

If you are hitting 0.42% or above, you are at or above the median. If you are consistently below 0.30%, something needs to change – either your targeting, your creative, or both. I cover specific [best practices for improving single image ad performance](/blog/linkedin-single-image-ads-best-practices-for-abm) in a separate guide.

## Single Image Ads CPC and CPM Benchmarks

The median CPC for [LinkedIn single image](/blog/linkedin-single-image-ads-best-practices-for-abm) ads is **$13.23**. The median CPM is **$59.15**.

Let me put that into a practical context. If you spend $1,000 on single image ads at the median CPC, you will get approximately 71 landing page clicks. At a 3-5% landing page conversion rate (typical for mid-funnel B2B offers), that translates to 2-4 conversions per $1,000 spent.

| Spend Level | Est. Clicks (at $13.23 CPC) | Est. Conversions (at 3-5% LP CVR) | Cost Per Conversion |
| $1,000/month | \~71 | 2-4 | $250-$500 |
| $3,000/month | \~227 | 7-11 | $273-$429 |
| $5,000/month | \~378 | 11-19 | $263-$455 |
| $10,000/month | \~756 | 23-38 | $263-$435 |

The CPM of $59.15 makes single image ads the most expensive in-feed format for raw impressions. For comparison, video ads run at $38.94 CPM and carousel ads at $45.28 CPM. If your primary goal is brand exposure and awareness, single image ads are not the most efficient use of budget.

But here is the thing – single image ads consistently deliver more clicks than video or carousel because the higher CTR (0.42% vs. 0.24% for video) more than compensates for the higher impression cost. It is a trade-off between impression efficiency and click efficiency.

## How Single Image Ads Compare to Other LinkedIn Ad Formats

Here is the full [format comparison from our benchmarks](/blog/linkedin-ads-ctr-benchmarks) dataset. This is the table I reference constantly when planning campaign budgets and choosing formats.

![LinkedIn Ad format performance table comparing CTR and CPC across TLAs, carousel and video ads](https://cdn.zenabm.com/media/LinkedIn-Ad-format-performance-overview-ZenABM.png)

| Metric | Single Image | Thought Leader Ads | Video | Carousel | Text Ads |
| **Median CTR** | 0.42% | 2.68% | 0.24% | 0.32% | Below 0.01% |
| **Median CPC** | $13.23 | $2.29 | $15.61 | $13.30 | $62+ |
| **Median CPM** | $59.15 | $49.37 | $38.94 | $45.28 | \~$2 |
| **Dwell Time** | 3.64s | 5.2s | varies | 4.56s | N/A |
| **Budget Share** | 61.87% | 17.2% | 14.8% | 2.73% | 3.4% |

The biggest insight from this comparison: **single image ads cost 77% more per landing page click than** [Thought Leader Ads. TLAs](/blog/linkedin-thought-leader-ads-for-abm) deliver clicks at $2.29 vs. $13.23 for single image. That is a massive difference.

So why do single image ads still get 61.87% of budget? A few reasons:

![LinkedIn single image ad showing 0.51% CTR from 7,838 impressions and 40 clicks, a benchmark example](https://cdn.zenabm.com/media/free-offer-linkedin-single-image-ad-performance-ZenABM.png)

- **Full creative control.** You design the visual, the copy, the CTA. With TLAs, you are boosting an employee’s organic post and have less control over the format.
- **Scalability.** You can run dozens of single image ad variations simultaneously. TLAs require real people posting real content first.
- **Direct response.** Single [image ads](/blog/linkedin-single-image-ad-specs) are purpose-built for driving to a specific landing page with a specific offer. They are the workhorse of mid-to-bottom funnel campaigns.
- **Familiarity.** Most marketers know how to create single image ads. TLAs are still relatively new and many teams have not adopted them yet.

My recommendation? Allocate 40-50% to single image ads (down from the 61.87% average) and redistribute toward TLAs and carousels. You will get more total clicks for the same budget.

## How to Beat These Benchmarks

When I [analyzed the top-performing single image](/blog/linkedin-single-image-ads-examples) ads in our dataset – the ones consistently hitting above 0.80% CTR – clear creative patterns emerged.

![ZenABM report showing a winning LinkedIn single image ad with a free 30-day offer and testimonial](https://cdn.zenabm.com/media/Top-performing-linkedin-single-image-ad-patterns-ZenABM-benchmarks-report.png)

### 1. Use the Problem-Solution Framework

![Userpilot single image ad example with a churn pain-point headline: Reduce Churn & Drive Expansion Revenue](https://cdn.zenabm.com/media/Reduce-churn-single-image-ad-pain-point.png)

The top-performing ads almost always follow this structure: name a specific pain point in the headline or intro text, then present the solution in the image and CTA. Generic messaging like “Learn more about our platform” does not cut it. Specificity wins.

### 2. Add Social Proof Elements

![Zenabm and productive case study image](https://cdn.zenabm.com/media/zenabm-productive-abm-marketing-testimonial.png)

Ads that included customer logos, specific metrics, or testimonial snippets in the image itself consistently outperformed ads without social proof. Even something as simple as “Used by 200+ B2B [teams” overlaid on the visual lifts engagement](/blog/account-scoring-from-linkedin-ad-data).

### 3. Try Before/After Comparisons

Before/after visuals drive clicks because they create a clear narrative arc in a single frame. “Before: manually tracking pipeline in spreadsheets. After: [automated ABM](/blog/signal-based-outbound) reporting.” People see themselves in the “before” and want the “after.

### 4. Show Your Product Interface

![Userpilot LinkedIn single image ad with a testimonial from Amplemarket's Awni Shamah as social proof](https://cdn.zenabm.com/media/Social-proof-on-single-image-ads.png)

For product-led companies, clean screenshots of the actual product interface work extremely well. This only works if the interface is visually appealing and the value is immediately clear from looking at it. Cluttered dashboards with tiny text do not perform.

### 5. Use Flowcharts and Process Visuals

![ZenABM's Black Friday LinkedIn single image ad showing a flowchart of a free intent-led outbound setup process](https://cdn.zenabm.com/media/Flowchart-example-top-performing-linkedin-single-image-ad-ZenABM.png)

Flowchart-style or process visuals generate the highest dwell times in our dataset (above 5 seconds vs. the 3.64-second median). People stop scrolling to read the steps. Higher dwell time correlates with higher recall and downstream conversion – even if CTR is average.

### 6. Refresh Creatives Monthly

This is less about creative strategy and more about operational discipline. The data is clear: single image ads that run longer than 4-6 weeks see declining CTR. Build a rotation schedule and stick to it. I run 3-4 active creatives per campaign at any given time and rotate one per week.

## FAQs

### What is a good CTR for LinkedIn single image ads?

Based on our 2026 [benchmarks data from 211 companies](/blog/linkedin-ads-benchmarks-2026), the median CTR is 0.42%. Anything above 0.50% puts you in the above-average tier. Ads hitting 0.80% or higher are in the top 15%. If you are consistently below 0.30%, your creative or targeting needs work. Keep in mind that CTR varies by funnel stage – awareness ads typically have higher CTR than bottom-funnel conversion ads, but the latter drive more valuable actions.

### How much should I budget for LinkedIn single image ads?

At the median CPC of $13.23, you need roughly $1,000/month to [generate about 71 landing page](/blog/best-abm-tools-linkedin-advertising) clicks. For meaningful testing and optimization, I recommend at least $3,000/month, which gives you approximately 227 clicks and enough data to identify what is working. Most companies in our dataset allocate 61.87% of their total LinkedIn ad budget to single image ads, though I recommend bringing that down to 40-50% and diversifying across formats.

### Are single image ads better than Thought Leader Ads on LinkedIn?

They serve different purposes. Single image ads give you full creative control and are easier to scale – you can run dozens of variations without needing employee-authored content. But Thought Leader Ads are dramatically cheaper per click ($2.29 vs. $13.23 CPC) and generate higher engagement (2.68% vs. 0.42% CTR). In practice, I use both: TLAs for top-of-funnel engagement and brand awareness, single image ads for mid-to-bottom funnel campaigns where I need to control the landing page experience and the creative message. The smartest approach is a mix, not an either/or decision.